(De)fraud
"Why is defraud is not the opposite of fraud?" asks my younger son. "It should be like - hey, you got scammed, here's some money."
« Paying for Linux | Main | Money Ruins Everything, but we have to talk about it anyway »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/614074/28949482
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference (De)fraud:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Circular References
- Not a Blogger
This here is a relaxed, slow-moving weblog. It ain't one o' them hyperactive updated-all-the-time weblogs. Slow down a little.
Book
Recent Posts
- Cloudy Monopolies II:
- O'Reilly vs Carr on Cloudy Monopolies
- All the Web's a Stage
- YouTube Becomes Big Business
- How Long Will This Post Survive?
- WikiBollocks: Tapscott DigiDemocracy Hype Shock Horror
- Graph Time: Canadian Election
- Election prediction (Not that one, the Canadian one)
- Blogging for the Man
- Letter to the Globe and Mail
Tools
- Sitemeter
Categories
- Book News
- Books
- Chapter 01 - A World of Choice
- Chapter 02 - Good Choices and Bad Outcomes
- Chapter 03 - Private Choices and Public Failures
- Chapter 04 - Arms Races and Red Queens
- Chapter 05 - Co-operation And Its Limits
- Chapter 06 - Divide and Conquer
- Chapter 07 - That Obscure Object of Desire
- Chapter 08 - Join Or Get Run Over
- Chapter 09 - The Devil You Know
- Chapter 10 - Free to Choose, But Exploited
- Chapter 11 - Beyond Whimsley
- Circular references
- Consumer Activism
- Consumer Choice
- Environment
- Film
- Inequality
- MarketThink
- Off Topic
- Reviews of No One Makes You Shop At Wal-Mart
- Tech
- The Long Tail
- Wal-Mart
- wikibollocks
I hope you've explained that "inflammable" doesn't mean fireproof.
Posted by: derek | May 10, 2008 at 01:11 PM